agreed

Deli crew agree with Bix here.

For: 8 | Against: 1 | Abstain: 0

+for — @brettdrawsstuff

+for smile — @krel

+for — @amiyoko

+for s tier trait — @frog

+for 🛵 — @pip

+for — @yes2crypto.eth

+against i agree with other comments that it could use with a redesign to look less like the car head — @humpty.eth

+for — @wylin

+for ⌐🛵-🛵 — @fattybuthappy

I love that we're adding & deliberating on traits all the time now, against going back to 1/year cadence

After spending some more time in SEA I realized scooter was a needed addition to Nouns. Great job Tummlin!

This is a joyful, superbly executed trait and I'm excited to have it (and Tummlin) be part of Nouns.

To all the broken code doomers: App maintainers, whether in web2 or web3, must always be monitoring for software updates. It's part of the "joy" of development. Luckily, our proposal process gives advanced, public notice of changes. But this notice isn't entirely needed; the beauty of Nouns is that all traits are onchain. If offchain code is too slow or onerous to update, app devs can always tap into the open data on Ethereum to pull the pixels their app needs.

Keep the traits coming! Keep Nouns Fresh!

I like the collage artwork at the bottom more than the actual head - the head is cute too!

Too FAST . Too FURIOUS. Broken code and updates. agree with BIX.

I do dig the trait.

Same as my signal reason but with more context....think we should consider all of the developers and apps who are 'building on Nouns' and how adding traits as one off will effect them, their dApps and the communities they build around those applications. Historically we have spent more of software & development costs vs compensation for traits yet it seems like not many are taking into consideration the butterfly effect of yeeting random one off traits. My suggestion....let's come to consensus on a time schedule so everyone can plan accordingly - once a year may be a bit too long, I would suggest quarterly.

The Nouncil has spoken.

We discuss all Nouns proposals every week in our Discord https://discord.gg/fdjJpMeV6K. The calls are public and all are welcome!

You can find a link to previous call recordings in our Discord "links" channel.

Nouncil must abstain from this proposal, as it failed to meet the vote threshold, with 15 votes for, 7 against, and 7 abstentions. While there was support for the new trait, concerns were raised about the proposal's lack of clarity regarding compensation. Specifically, the request for a Noun from the treasury as a reward was not explicitly stated, leading to discomfort among some voters. The need for transparency in such requests contributed to the mixed response.

FOR - 15 VOTES

borg00000 | "🛵"

benbodhi | "Beautiful trait. I made a scooter head that is not motorised though so feel like this head should be named motor scooter or something along those lines. But my scooter head trait is not in nouns, so first in best dressed on the naming."

AGAINST - 7 VOTES

.mach. | "This is asking for a noun as compensation without explicitly stating that in the prop. Feels a little weird"

peterpandam | "proposal should state that a Noun from the treasury is being requested as a reward."

ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES

Easy yes vote for me. I'm strongly in favor of adding traits, and I know many want a more optimized additions system, but we'll get there.

In the meantime, tummlin is an extremely Nounish artist, and this Scooter head trait is fun and matches the aesthetic quality of their Tiger head trait, which has already been added to the traits bank.

Also, I don't mind one treasury Noun as payment for this service. It's an interesting way to esteem the core contributors of Nounish art, or at least something I'm okay with trialing for now.

that smile. that damn smile

⌐◨-◨

⌐◨-◨

give eth instead of a noun and i'm 'for'

Ahh.. mouse 199, granddaddy mouse. the leader- good choice.. we've gotta save all of the dirty little vermin from the treasury before they're exterminated 🐀

I think artist should be rewarded differently, and as said in other previous props I don't want to set precedent that we pay a noun for adding a head. Voting against

🛵

I like the trait and the implicit "smile" that results, and also would like to see regular trait cadence rather than one-offs

Thanks Tummlin for a sweet looking scooter! New trait summer is on

We need a sdk to properly manage trait additions to the nouns repo. I dont have the technical abilities but it would be great if anyone wants to put up a prop. Or get in touch with me and we can figure this out.

https://www.lilnouns.wtf/vote/nounsdao/586/votes

FOR 8 VOTES

0x65A3...1D63 | "Traits are tough bc they are so subjective but this one passes the bar for me. I wouldn't be opposed to doing some sort of "week of new traits" though and having a voting period and isolated time to add new traits once a year."

0x2d9c...AA8B | "Why not?"

AGAINST 163 VOTES

0x9e0e...57B1 | "I personally don't like it and reserve the right to that opinion."

ABSTAIN 29 VOTES

Fans of adding more traits, but can't get behind this one. Traits should be unique and distinguishable, this one feels a too much like the Car head trait.

Echo what Bixbite and Toady said, as a team that runs a app, we don't think adding one-off traits is the best approach. It's challenging to keep up with governance as it is. Would like to see a better way to add traits.

＋1

one of my favorite noundry outputs. love that platform smile

Beautiful trait! Tummlin is an awesome pixel artist. His eye for the style and detail is on point. Looking forward to seeing this added.

In favor of making traits abundant within an infinite work of art. When doing so, we should reward the artists and make it a norm.

Also in favor of figuring out the best way to handle these over time, but I don’t see that as a reason to vote against. We can figure that out while also adding new traits.

Adding a head trait to this infinite work of art should earn you a Noun. This is an excellent example of proof of work—'mining' a new trait. Doing it constantly without waiting a whole year feels right for an ongoing, ever-changing work of art. If people think doing it at this pace is not sustainable, I'd prefer to see an increase in the 'mining' difficulty and make it two head traits for a full Noun, for instance, instead of not rewarding at all. Until then, let's keep rewarding a head with a head.

Very cute & Nounish.

Who will come up with a better way to add traits then one-off props?

https://warpcast.com/krel/0x644edb9f

we're lucky to have tummlin as a super fan and contributing artist to Nouns.

@playdna_ - A collective of individuals collaborating on a mission to make Nouns playable.

PlayDNA is AGAINST with a 4-0 vote result. See below for our members' votes with reasons:

AGAINST

TheBower.eth: Echo bixbite's reasoning.

eusoujp.eth: I like the trait, but I don't like the precedent of earning a Noun for each trait added to the collection at the current pace.

joaoborges.eth: +1 @bixbite.eth & @eusoujp.eth

FabValle.eth: I simply love the trait, it's really cool. But I go with @eusoujp.eth on this.

+for because this is a very nice trait.

+1 to this feedback though from bixbite/toady

I agree with a comment Toady made on Warpcast, perhaps we should move back to a once a year event where traits are voted into the collection all at once.