ProposalsProposal 564
ProposalsProposal 564
tldr; This proposal aims to add Tuba and Sandcastle traits to the correct descriptor contract attached to NounsToken.
Unfortunately, we updated the wrong descriptor contract in our recent trait add props. Props 533 and 556 called addHeads at 0x6229...6268. As prop 396 set the NFTs descriptor to 0x25fF...7951, new traits cannot not be minted until they're added to the correct descriptor 0x25fF...7951.
Txn Adds both heads in order of props. head-tuba will attain seed 250, head-sand-castle will attain 251
tldr; This proposal aims to add Tuba and Sandcastle traits to the correct descriptor contract attached to NounsToken.
Unfortunately, we updated the wrong descriptor contract in our recent trait add props. Props 533 and 556 called addHeads at 0x6229...6268. As prop 396 set the NFTs descriptor to 0x25fF...7951, new traits cannot not be minted until they're added to the correct descriptor 0x25fF...7951.
Txn Adds both heads in order of props. head-tuba will attain seed 250, head-sand-castle will attain 251
For: 3 | Against: 0 | Abstain: 0
+for — @brettdrawsstuff
+for dope pixel art — @fattybuthappy
+for Tubas are Nounish — @bixbite
The nouniverse has voted through $NOGS ⌐◨-◨
FOR: 15 AGAINST: 1
26400 $NOGS have been shared among the participants.
I prefer the Sax, but Tubas are Nounish ⌐◨-◨ Also agree with three9s, would be great if theres a way to outline proposal templates to avoid these issues in the future.
Thank you Dot for catching this! We have updated the flow on gallery.noundry.wtf, so this error should not occur going forward.
https://www.lilnouns.wtf/vote/nounsdao/564/votes
FOR 27 VOTES
AGAINST 117 VOTES
0x9e0e...57B1 | "The stance hasn't changed since the original proposal."
ABSTAINS 0 VOTES
Would be awesome if you could outline how we could avoid these mistakes in the future.
Would be awesome if you could outline how we could avoid these mistakes in the future.
Grateful for the cleanup! Let’s bring the new traits across the finish line