🥌 🥌 x FOR ↳ benbodhi.eth ↳ satori.wtf

Giving weight to zero weight votes with reason.

lfg ⌐◨-◨

🪬✨

the value lils has brought to nouns is immeasurable, firmly establishing dot & adelidusiam as two of the most deserving members in our community. also, 1+ krel, werder.

What Krel said :)

I was originally for, but am now against based on thebower's point. I am support the idea of granting nouns to people who are contributing/contributed to the ecosystem, but we should make the venue for that singular as opposed to fragmented and ad hoc. I like the idea of using nouner scout for this and directing individuals to that venue. Pro these individuals getting nouns, would prefer through nouner scout.

Love little nouns and am supportive of this. That said, I'd strongly prefer us to standardize this vs. doing one-off. Seems like we should have a process that we follow (e.g NounerScout).

Lil Nouns has been many people’s entry point into Nouns. Expanding the accessibility of Nouns should be rewarded. That history will always matter, regardless of current governance.

sent from voter.wtf

lil nouns, big impact ⌐◨-◨

Poll failed to meet vote threshold.

FOR - 18 VOTES

benbodhi | "I like it ⌐◨-◨"

borg00000 | "This has to happen, Lil Nouns are for the children."

AGAINST - 16 VOTES

peterpandam | "weaponized against nounsdao by arbers"

ABSTAINS - 4 VOTES

Founding a nounish DAO with as many people in the ecosystem as lils is nounish.

https://www.lilnouns.wtf/vote/nounsdao/438/votes

FOR 1046 VOTES

0xae4705dC0816ee6d8a13F1C72780Ec5021915Fed | "feels good to vote what i think; I wanna say cheers to these guys for everything they continue to do - I am enjoying the infinite ride." 0x2eE0485f71764bcD2062A84d9455688c581B90f8 | "LFG" 0x9e0e9D25a5ED9bc773f91691f0b45599255257B1 | "I prefer to do it ourselves as a DAO. We used to hold 16 Nouns. Do we still have those? Oops. 🤔"

AGAINST 982 VOTES

ABSTAINS 0 VOTES

Lil Nouns has had a tremendous impact on the Nouns ecosystem led by dot and adel.

One note on the Bower's feedback re: nouner scout -- this has not been created to reward existing builders in the ecosystem. Seneca's prop and all messaging since has been that the nouner scout prop house is to attract those outside our ecosystem although I'd greatly support a prop house for existing builders ideally where the winner select their own noun via some kind of claim (I believe a couple people are working on that mechanism).

But for now, we are distributing nouns via onchain props and I do believe that both dot and adel have had signficant impact on the Nouns ecosystem and are deserving of this hard earned reward. Having spent quite a bit of time in Lil Nouns, I can attest that they have led the community well and are dedicated to the success of Lil Nouns and Nouns.

redistribution of nouns to long term contributors is a good tactic for reducing some of the painful effects of the arb

Lils as an entity is something i have a very mixed relationship with. Parts of lils i find interesting/important, others quite troublesome. But i dont think the impact lils had on nouns can be disputed. Especially the amount of makers and true fans that found their way to nouns via lils is impressive, and the main reason im voting for.

Also disagree with bower re nounerscout, which is meant to bring new ppl into nouns, not retro reward current players.

We now have a working dedicated flow for awarding nouns to impactful individuals - nounerscout. While I see the merits in awarding nouns the lil nounders, I believe we should focus that forum from now on.

Round one is open: https://prop.house/nouns/army-pickle

No, if I had a Veto I'd use it on this.