Fund a code4rena audit for DAO V3
Proposal votes
Activity
FOR - 40 VOTES
DonJon | "No brainer"
AGAINST - 0 VOTES
ABSTAINS - 9 VOTES
My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.”
Securing Nouns while funding independent auditors for a public audit report is clearly a public good. Easy yes!
no brainer. have used code4rena before and was happy with results. nice getting loads of new technical eyes on the project too. who knows, might even attract some new builders as well as ensuring free of vulns.
Clearly we should get our contracts audited. One thing not mentioned in the prop, but I hope to see: sharing of the audit results.
Abstaining from this vote as I don't believe the Nouns Fork should be implemented. I appreciate and respect all of the work the team put into v3, and expect this audit prop to pass, but the fork mechanism is likely dangerous for the DAO.
Voting For the audit of course but confused about this part:
Objection-only Period: a conditional voting period that gets activated upon a last-minute proposal swing from defeated to successful, affording against voters more reaction time.
Not sure why more time is being given for no votes but not last minute yes votes. But that doesn't impact the need for the audit.