I think this is a good thing to do, but I also think we should reward folks for their contributions. Would have preferred to pass the previous version.

Yes! Next stop nouns.⌐◨-◨

Reverse ENS addresses FTW!

Voting against as I voted for 202: I think we should reward people for their time and ideas and it is a bad look not to do so.

I voted FOR on Prop 202 so will abstaining here. I believe that ideas are valuable and the originator should be given a chance to revise with a more appropriate reward.

We want to encourage builders to suggest improvements to the DAO. If all suggestions to improve the DAO are copypasted into a new Prop without a reward, we are doing ourselves a disservice by discouraging new builders to be rewarded for their efforts.

Dominant vs the original

Nouncil Vote:

47 Yes, 5 No, 1 Abstain

9 Nouncillors abstained from the decision

YES WINS

Vote Reasons & Discussion

Brook | "would have voted AGAINST on Prop 202 had I known this would happen."

0xDariush | "they removed the eth from the prop and problem solved, so YES"

Classic_Craig | "this makes sense as an easy solution for sending and receiving."

Josep | "I believe it will be beneficial for the DAO to have a recognizable ENS."

Benbodhi | "Wen nouns.⌐◨-◨"

kerimbonia | "well, now that you put it like that how can we say no?"

lilpizza.eth | "Easy yes since there is no 1 eth ask included."

For more Nouns DAO proposal discussion head to the Nouncil Discord: https://discord.gg/nouncil

already voted for prop 202 and believe the brand awareness is worth a reward.

wen nouns.⌐◨-◨